AI takes your first technical round. Your engineers meet only the best.
A live AI interviewer that probes like your best engineer — cheat-proof, evidence-scored, done in minutes.
From $12 per screen · vs $200–450 for a human round · evidence-scored in minutes
current question
LRU cache with O(1) operations
Design a cache that evicts the least-recently-used key in constant time.
why now
The first technical screen is broken.
It's either outsourced at $450 a round — or quietly gamed by tools like Cluely and Interview Coder. Right when a wrong senior hire is a six-figure mistake.
EasyInterview replaces it with one live, cheat-proof interview — evidence-scored, calibrated to your bar, back in minutes.
See a sample report →cost per technical screen
$450
$0
vs $200–450 for a human round
cheat-proof · 0 engineer hours · verdict in minutes
why it works
Signal your panel can hire on.
Take-homes get gamed and phone screens are inconsistent. This is a structured technical round that returns the same evidence-backed signal for every candidate.
01 — predictive
A candidate who clears our screen clears your panel.
We score the same signals your loop does — problem decomposition, correctness, depth under pressure — so your interviewers only meet people worth their time.
screen score → on-site pass rate
calibrated to your rubric · illustrative cohort
how it works
Three steps to a verdict you can trust.
Configure your bar
Set the level, rounds, and rubric your loop screens on. We calibrate the interviewer to that bar.
Send a link
Candidates take a 45–60 minute voice round on their own schedule. No scheduling, no interviewer time.
Evidence-scored verdict
Minutes later: a hire/no-hire verdict backed by per-question deductions, the transcript, and the recording.
see it live
Watch the two-minute walkthrough.
From configuring your bar to reading the scorecard — the whole loop, start to finish.
product_walkthrough.mp4 · 00:00 / 02:00
a real screen recording — no edits, no cuts
the deliverable
One scorecard. Every reason behind the score.
No black box and no vibe check. Every candidate comes back with a defensible, evidence-backed report you can take straight to the hiring committee.
See the sample reportPriya Sharma
senior · system design + coding
0.0
/ 10 overall
Strong hireScoped the rate-limiter cleanly and reached an O(1) LRU without hints. Lost ground on hot-key sharding. Clears the senior bar.
confidence 7.2 / 10 · calibrated to your bar
per-question deductions · transcript · recording →
the recording
Watch a full interview, end to end.
Every session is recorded and transcript-linked — replay any moment behind any score, chaptered by question.
…I'd reach for a token bucket so bursts are absorbed cleanly, then shard the counters by key.
chaptered by question · every flag jumps to the exact moment
what teams say
The first round nobody dreads.
Engineering leaders and recruiters lean on EasyInterview to protect senior time and trust the top of their funnel.
“The evidence is what sold my panel. Every score links to the exact moment in the transcript — so “no-hire” conversations take minutes, not meetings. My interviewers stopped re-litigating decisions.”
Daniel Osei
Head of Talent · Northwind
“We caught two candidates using assist tools in week one. A take-home never would have flagged them.”
Priya Raman
Engineering Manager · Cobalt
“A consistent bar across every candidate — finally. Same questions, same rubric, same evidence, every time.”
Omar Haddad
Recruiting Ops · Slate
“Set up in an afternoon — our first screens went out the same week.”
Sofia Marin
Arcbase
“Finally a screen my engineers don't resent running.”
Tom Reyes
Halcyon
“Debriefs are a formality now — the evidence is already there.”
Aisha Khan
Fathom
“Cut our time-to-onsite in half without dropping the bar.”
Lucas Meyer
Beacon
“Set up in an afternoon — our first screens went out the same week.”
Sofia Marin
Arcbase
“Finally a screen my engineers don't resent running.”
Tom Reyes
Halcyon
“Debriefs are a formality now — the evidence is already there.”
Aisha Khan
Fathom
“Cut our time-to-onsite in half without dropping the bar.”
Lucas Meyer
Beacon
“Candidates tell us it feels like a real interview, not a quiz.”
Nina Patel
Cirrus
“We stopped losing strong seniors to slow scheduling.”
Marco Bianchi
Tessell
“The hot-key follow-up caught exactly what our loop would have.”
Grace Lim
Vertex
“One link, and the first round runs itself.”
Ken Adachi
Monarch
“Candidates tell us it feels like a real interview, not a quiz.”
Nina Patel
Cirrus
“We stopped losing strong seniors to slow scheduling.”
Marco Bianchi
Tessell
“The hot-key follow-up caught exactly what our loop would have.”
Grace Lim
Vertex
“One link, and the first round runs itself.”
Ken Adachi
Monarch
pricing
Credit packs, not seats.
Credits are weighted by round — coding 1, system design 2 — so a pack stretches across dozens of screens.
Starter
$750
25 credits · $30 each
Run a focused pilot on one role and see the signal for yourself.
- 25 interview credits
- Evidence-scored reports
- Full recording + transcript
- ATS-ready scorecard export
Growth
$1,500
100 credits · $15 each
Screen every candidate against the same bar, every time.
- 100 credits — half the per-screen cost of Starter
- Calibrated to your loop's rubric
- Per-question deductions + evidence
- ATS export — Greenhouse, Lever, Ashby
Scale
Custom
500+ credits · from $12 each
Cheat-proof screening across every team you're hiring for.
- 500+ credits at volume pricing
- Dedicated calibration to each loop
- Priority onboarding
- ATS export + audit support
faq
Questions, answered.
How is this different from a take-home or a CoderPad screen?
It's a live voice round that probes the why behind every answer — so it can't be outsourced or pasted in. The interviewer cross-questions on trade-offs and complexity the way a senior engineer would, and flags the lookup and tool-assisted patterns that take-homes can't catch.
Will it actually predict who clears our loop?
We calibrate the rubric to your bar and score the same signals your panel scores — decomposition, correctness, depth under pressure. A candidate who passes our screen should pass your on-site, so your engineers only spend time on the right people.
How do you keep candidates from cheating?
The round is conversational and adaptive — answers have to be reasoned aloud and defended under follow-ups, which is exactly what tools like Cluely and Interview Coder can't fake. The report flags anomalies, and the full recording and transcript sit behind every score.
Is the scoring explainable, or a black box?
Every score links to the transcript quote and the specific deduction behind it. You see where marks were lost, what the optimal answer was, and the evidence — defensible scoring you can stand behind with candidates and hiring committees.
What does the candidate experience?
A browser-native, 45–60 minute voice interview they can take on their own schedule — no install, no scheduling back-and-forth. Consistent questions and a fair, consistent bar for everyone.
Can we get the results into our ATS?
Yes — every report exports a scorecard you can attach to the candidate, with ATS integrations (Greenhouse, Lever, Ashby) on the roadmap. Book a demo and we'll map it to your workflow.
get started
Only meet the engineers who'll clear your loop.
A cheat-proof, evidence-scored first round for $12 a candidate — so your engineers skip the phone screens and only meet people who'll pass.
Start with a pilot on one role · calibrated to your bar · live in days